O yo no sé encontrarlo, o realmente no existen buenos y completos libros sobre la Luna en castellano. Si alguien conoce alguno le agradecería que lo comentara.
Este de Gerald North, "Guía para observar la Luna" (http://www.amazon.es/GUIA-PARA-OBSERVAR ... ds=la+Luna) que está bastante bien, ya lo tengo... lo compré en inglés cuando todavía no había salido la versión en castellano y no me importaría volver a comprarlo, siempre y cuando no costara el dineral que cuesta
.Y por supuesto, como libro básico tengo el imprescindible "Descubrir la Luna" de Larousse. (http://www.amazon.es/Descubrir-Luna-Lar ... ds=la+Luna)
Pero no he visto nada más que valiera la pena.
Por otro lado, buscando alguno en inglés he llegado a uno que no tengo y que no conocía: "The Moon biography" de David Whitehouse (http://www.amazon.es/The-Moon-Biography ... 0747264953)
Me ha parecido atractivo hasta que he leído el comentario de Charles Wood acerca del libro en cuestión:
"This book is a delight to read and it contains much interesting information about the Moon in science, history and culture, as well as anecdotes about lunar observers and scientists. But please don't believe everything you read! The book is so full of factual errors that I have to conclude that the author - apparently a radio astronomer - has no real understanding of lunar science! Starting with the acknowledgments - where the phrase reflection telescope is used rather than reflector - there are too many errors to list, but I will give a flavor of them: Lunar mascons are not due to buried iron projectiles; central peaks first appear in craters about 15 km in diameter, not 40 km; Aristarchus is not the center of a network of rilles; the Rheita Valley is composed of basin secondary craters; Beer and Madler's lunar map was published in 1834-6, not 1878; Gerard Kuiper never worked with Percival Lowell; the magma ocean formed 4.5 billion years ago, not 3.9; Eratosthenian craters postdate - not predate - the formation of mare; etc; etc. With so many errors in the lunar science and history sections, I have to wonder if there are others in the cultural discussions where I am less well informed. So, am I just being unduly negative, critical of details, and missing the value of a readable popular introduction to the Moon? Perhaps. The book does fill a gap and if it encourages readers to learn more about the Moon it will serve an important function. But in a larger sense this book is worrisome. It is like many news reports that tell a good story, but are ignorant or, or actively screw up the real content. I think factual honesty matters - the publisher and author could have cleaned up most of the errors with a competent pre-publication review - apparently they didn't bother".
Básicamente, que se trata de un libro lleno de errores de bulto
Luego he seguido leyendo los demás comentarios y me ha dado la sensación de estar viendo un programa de TV de Tele 5
De momento lo pongo en cuarentena.
Pues eso, ¿tenéis alguna sugerencia en castellano?
Saludos a todos.
):
)
yo pagué 37$ hace 4 años... 
)
